Hello, friends: This letter was delivered to Judge Whyte this morning. Perhaps each of you would like to request a hearing, to explain why your email should not be turned over to the church. Perhaps some of you would have some remarks about the consequences to third parties. Perhaps you will think of better arguments than I did. This letter will be in a new **Biased Journalism** so please regard it as confidential until I publish it. I might not do so until the Judge makes an answer, which I think he will do shortly. [That's because the Plaintiffs requested accelerated discovery and he granted it.] lives close enough to the courthose in San Jose to hand deliver your letters. As a defendant, I presume Grady Ward has the Judge's fax number. If you send something to the Judge Grady should have a copy too. Perhaps he can even fax it in for you. Grady's phone number is (707) 826-7172. If you're going to do something, do it quickly. Shelley ----------- Shelley Thomson 236 Stanford S/C, Suite 142 Palo Alto, CA 94304 Hon. Ronald M. Whyte, Federal Judge Northern District of California San Jose, CA April 4, 1996 No. C 96-20207 RMW Hand Delivered Letter to Judge Whyte Dear Judge Whyte: I am the publisher of **Biased Journalism**, a news/humor magazine covering issues of interest to citizens of cyberspace. Among other events the Journal has covered a series of hearings now taking place in your courtroom. I was shocked to see my name on the list of documents demanded by Plaintiffs from Mr. Ward. The relevant selection from the Notice of Deposition of Defendant Grady Ward and Request for Production of Documents And Things is the following: >13. Any and all documents relating to communications with the following >individuals relating to the Advanced Technology: > >a. Alex DeJoode >b. Dennis Erlich >c. Steven Fishman >d. Johan Helsingius >e. Jeff Jacobsen >f. Keith Henson >g. Tom Klemesrud >h. Arnaldo Lerma >i. Peter Mante >j. Ron Neuman >k. Robert Penny >l. Felipe Rodriquez >m. Karin Spaink >n. Shelly Thomson *** >o. David Touretzky >p. Lawrence Wollersheim **Biased Journalism** has carried many stories about scientology. As a journalist, I strongly protest the inclusion of my name on this list. The exposure of my private communication would have an extreme chilling effect upon my ability to gather and publish news. It is an infringement of my rights under the First Amendment. Moreover, it might expose third parties to harm. With reference to the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (section 2700-2707 of Title 18 USC), it is my understanding that lawful access to stored electronic communications requires a warrant or a court order. Even if the ECPA were disregarded, I suggest to Your Honor that the right to privacy of Mr. Ward's correspondents should be protected. I believe that at minimum, Plaintiffs should be required to show cause for their request for each person's correspondence individually. I request such a hearing on my own behalf, so that I may explain to the court why my correspondence with Grady Ward should not be delivered to the Plaintiffs. Sincerely yours, Shelley Thomson publisher, **Biased Journalism** sthomson@netcom.com